“我为文旅产业发展献一策”主题活动开课
同时,“青马学习班”还破题“线上课堂”。学习班在微信公众号、短视频等平台组建“青马之声”等一系列线上“微课堂”。周昌勇在线下学习之余,就通过这些线上课堂巩固、拓展知识,将学习阵地由“一时一地”拓展为“随时随地”。
除了在实践中感悟、在线上巩固,专家学者、一线权威人士的“点拨”也是学习不可缺少的一环,这就是“青马学习班”精心打造的“特色课堂”。在实地调研之后,学员们将与研究机构的专家学者,市委市政府相关领导、相关领域先进工作者“面对面”。他们结合学员们的参观体验,为学员传经送宝。在这个过程中,龙泉形成了“部门解惑、书记点评”的特色学习模式,相关部门负责人全程参与、市委书记到场点评。
周昌勇说:“以前我只关注自己的‘一亩三分地’, ‘三个课堂’拓宽了视野,提升了格局,我现在不仅对全市的情况有了系统了解,更加深了对党的二十大、浙江省第十五次党代会等重要精神的理解。”
三场交流:学以致用见实效
学习,是为了致用。“青马学习班”从一开始,就树立了“真学习、真思考、真效果”的鲜明导向,通过开展读书分享沙龙、调研成果汇报、项目谋划路演三场交流活动,引导学员互看互学、互比互赛,在思想碰撞、交流分享中明理增信。
学员进行分享
“我的本职工作是在经济与财务方面,学习班让我有了一个将自身特长与龙泉发展结合的机会。”学员毛剑斌在考察中对“三农”工作有了很深体悟,通过与其他同学的分享交流,逐步完善自己的想法,最终形成《将“新意”贯彻“三农”——我对“三农”工作的建议》,对龙泉市如何培育新农民、打造新农村、发展新产业提出了系统的建议。
此外,龙泉还立足自身剑瓷文化特色,开设剑瓷匠人班,紧扣宝剑与青瓷产业发展,对学员进行系统性培训,鼓励学员们积极交流探索将古法与现代工艺融合的发展路径,并形成报告,助力剑瓷产业创新发展。
截至2022年12月中旬,“青马学习班”已形成各个领域的重点调研报告86份,为龙泉各类特色产业发展贡献力量。
很多学员说,参加学习班之前,他们都觉得理论就像“飘在天上的云彩”,可望不可即,通过“三个课堂”“三场交流”的学习,才真正感觉到,理论就在大家的身边,只要大家愿意“蹦一蹦”,理论的果实就一定摘得着。
事实上,“青马学习班”搭建了龙泉青年交流发展、共同进步的平台。在这里,学员带着求知的热情和为民的情怀前进,正在迸发出锐不可当的“青春力量”。
(光明网记者 陈建栋、李澍)
相关阅读
【浙江龙泉“青马学习班”系列调研(一)】搭建一个“出真知”的学习体系
中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图:日本福岛第一核电站。2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。
因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。
日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
(文图:赵筱尘 巫邓炎) [责编:天天中] 阅读剩余全文() |